|
Genesis
of Kashmir Conflict (cont)
Kashmir's
reunification and Independence:
The option of reunification and
independence of Kashmir is the dream of every Kashmiri nationalist,
including myself. An independent Kashmir could become a "bridge of peace"
between India and Pakistan, bringing an end not only to the suffering of
Kashmir, but peace and prosperity to the entire sub-continent. By allowing
Kashmir to enjoy some form of an independent status, neither India nor
Pakistan stand to loose anything.
However, Kashmir's independence although
quite appealing in many respects does pose some serious problems, given
the wide differences of opinion and divisions within various regions of
the state of Jammu and Kashmir. Moreover with
the lack of any perceptible political or militant movement for
independence within the Pakistan held parts of Kashmir; reunification and
independence of Kashmir remains a distant goal.
Right from the beginning, Pakistan has
always rejected the option of Kashmiri independence. On the other hand,
India being one of the largest democracies in the world may find it very
difficult to deny independence to Kashmir if achieved through a process of
democracy. And given time and persuasion, the present lack of political
will shown by India and Pakistan in favour of Kashmir's independence, may
well change in its favour tomorrow. With no viable economy, lack of
infrastructure and institutions Kashmir’s independence at this stage is a
pipe dream.
Four major wars between India and
Pakistan over Kashmir have proved that Pakistan does not have the
capability to win the part of Kashmir within Indian control through a
conventional war. While, India cannot take the risk of a fifth war, to
regain the part of Kashmir under Pakistan's control. But the threat of a
fifth Indo-Pak confrontation in the future, possibly nuclear, with
devastating consequences for the entire sub-continent must remain a
serious concern for all of us.
|
The way forward:
History provides hindsight, but with
foresight, we may be able to bring an end to this 63-year old conflict
that has plagued Indo-Pak relations since 1947 and brought untold
suffering for the people of Kashmir.
As Karl Marx has said, "history repeats
itself, first as tragedy, second as farce". It seems pointless wasting a
lifetime arguing and fighting over a solution of the Kashmir problem based
on the bitter post-partition Indo-Pak political history of Kashmir.
Instead, we must focus our attention to the processes or the means for
achieving an end to this tragic conflict.
World is fast shrinking into a global
village sharing economy, trade and resources for human development with
each other across the borders and territories. If Kashmir has to develop
and share this progress, both India and Pakistan would need to be
economically strong and politically stable....for this peace between the
two is sine quo non.
A peaceful and lasting solution of the
Kashmir problem can only emerge through a step by step process of dialogue
between India, Pakistan and the legitimate representatives of the Kashmiri
people. But the first pre-requisite for such a dialogue is an end to the
violence irrespective of its origin or target- a dialogue and conflict
cannot co-exist.
However, a durable peace in Kashmir can
only emerge if the common man, irrespective of which side of the Line of
Control he comes from is convinced that his aspirations and interests are
going to be honoured.
Looking at the events in Kashmir from
1947 - 2004, It has a moral for both India and Pakistan. The Kashmir
crisis cannot be resolved by short cuts, for working out a lasting
solution India, Pakistan and the People of Jammu and Kashmir shall have to
shun the premonitions and start a fresh initiating for a peaceful solution
of the erstwhile princely state of Jammu and Kashmir. Otherwise, any other
measures will be like just cutting the tail of a reptile, which has the
capacity to grow.
A pragmatic,
practical and achievable goal, which the people of Kashmir ought to pursue
through peaceful means is, "the restoration of post-accession autonomy and
all those institutions that existed during Maharaja's time".
|
|